Cinema Novo had its roots in the troubled socio-political landscape of Brazil during that era and gradually emerged as a hotbed of artistic resistance. The following article deals with the history, celebrated filmmakers, recognisable masterpieces, and themes that characterised it.
Preview
History of Cinema Novo
Cinema Novo came at a very important time, during periods of huge political and social flux within Brazil. By the late 1950s, Brazil was grappling with issues such as extreme poverty, systemic inequality, and political instability. When optimism over President Juscelino Kubitschek died down, the outright years of political turbulence reached a height in the 1964 coup. The tensions of that society acted as a seedbed for the new generation of filmmakers who started using cinema as a medium to show the stark realities of Brazilian life.
The movement was deeply inspired by Italian Neorealism and the French New Wave, adopting their location shooting, use of nonprofessional actors, and showing the struggles of ordinary people. But even so, Cinema Novo spoke with its voice, rooted in the socio-cultural and economic realities of Brazil. One of the leading figures of the movement, Glauber Rocha, summed up its ethos in the now-famous maxim: “A camera in the hand and an idea in the head.”
Cinema Novo evolved in three distinctive phases…
1960-1964: The First Phase
The first films to arise out of Cinema Novo dealt with Brazil’s rural poor and caught the stark inequalities of life in the countryside. Often, films were shot in black-and-white stock with an ascetic, documentary-like quality.
1964-1968: Second Phase
The Cinema Novo movement turned more allegorical and politicised after the 1964 military coup. Filmmakers employ symbolism and surrealism to get through the censorship while criticising the authoritarian rule and social inequality.
1968–1974: Third Phase
It was also the time of the Tropicália cultural movement, which combined the avant-garde with popular culture. Internecine squabbles and increasing censorship broke up Cinema Novo by the mid-1970s.
Key filmmakers
Several great, visionary directors were associated with the Cinema Novo movement, each of them putting his signature into it.
Glauber Rocha
Sometimes hailed as the intellectual leader of the movement, Rocha is doubtless most famous for having written the manifesto Estética da fome, which advocated a cinema that would take on the real conditions of Brazilian culture and economy. A film like the seminal Black God, White Devil Deus e o Diabo na Terra do Sol (1964), and Entranced Earth Terra em Transe 1967typifies his classic blend of realism, allegory, and political commentary.
Nelson Pereira dos Santos
A forerunner of Cinema Novo, Nelson Pereira dos Santos, predicted this movement with Rio, 40 Graus (1955), then consolidated his prestige with the inescapable presence of Barren Lives (Vidas Secas, 1963), a haunting look at life in Brazil’s drought-stricken northeast.
Ruy Guerra
A key figure in the movement’s first phase, Ruy Guerra directed The Guns Os Fuzis, 1964, a bleak confrontation with class struggle and exploitation in rural Brazil.
Carlos Diegues
Diegues fills in the gap between Cinema Novo and the popular culture of Brazil. Films like Bye Bye Brazil (1980) make his style much more communicative, yet bitingly critical.
Joaquim Pedro de Andrade
Blending wit and criticism, Andrade’s Macunaíma 1969 is a satire of Brazilian society, which owes much to the influence of the literature of modernism.
Key Films
Several films from Cinema Novo are milestones of world cinema, recognised for their artistic innovation and socio-political relevance:
Barren Lives, 1963 – Nelson Pereira dos Santos
A family’s struggle to survive in the arid northeast of Brazil. The film is characterized by sparse dialogue, vivid imagery, and the brutalities of poverty.
Black God, White Devil, 1964 – Glauber Rocha
It is a gripping parable of beliefs, powers, and rebelliousness in rural Brazil, where religion and politics meet.
The Guns (1964) – Ruy Guerra
Tjis films portray a realistic evocation of the conflict between impoverished rural workers and the military in the interior of Brazil.
Themes and Tropes
Cinema Novo is also beholden thematically and stylistically to the representation of Brazil’s complexity and contradictions:
Social Inequality and Poverty: Most of the films that came from the movement represented the plight of the underprivileged people of Brazil, the rural poor. Stories told about the objective injustice: exploitation, hunger, and violence.
Political Critique: Filmmakers use their movies to belittle the political establishment for its corruption, authoritarianism, and shortcomings of populist rhetoric.
Religious Symbolism: Religion was used within Cinema Novo both as an instrument of repression and also as a carrier of resistance. Filmmakers have explored conflicts between faith and politics in the film Black God, White Devil.
Allegory and Surrealism: Allegorical narrative constructions and surrealist imagery have been a common means for directors to get through the censor’s eye-on-the-wall onto sensitive themes.
Brazilian Identity: Perhaps the most fundamental issue Cinema Novo addressed was what it actually means to be Brazilian. Filmmakers celebrated cultural, racial, and regional diversity in this country, attacking stereotypes and embracing the contradictions.
The aesthetic of Hunger: Glauber Rocha’s aesthetic of hunger was a raw, visceral call to arms, a counterpoint to the socio-economic struggle in Brazil; it disowned varnished Hollywood conventions in search of gritty realism.
While the Cinema Novo wave officially declined in the mid-1970s, its influence is alive in Brazilian and world cinema, opening up possibilities to the subsequent generations of breaking through social barriers, formal experimentation as an essential trait, and narrating from the margins. Filmmakers like Walter Salles in his Central Station and Fernando Meirelles in his City of God are taking inspiration from its revolutionary spirit continuously.
In the broader perspective of world cinema, Cinema Novo is celebrated as a major phase in the history of the film movements that tried to blend art and activism together. The emphasis laid on authenticity, experimentation, and socio-political commitment has remained a model for filmmakers everywhere seeking to create substantial, arresting cinema.
